'Justice'

National Homelessness & Hunger Awareness Week

Posted on 26. Oct, 2016 by .

0

November 12-20, 2016 is National Homelessness and Hunger Awareness Week, sponsored by the National Coalition for the Homeless.  This year, the National Coalition is focusing Homelessness and Hunger Awareness Week on criminalization: laws passed by local governments which prevent people experiencing homelessness from doing life-sustaining activities.

The report from the Policy Advocacy Clinic at Berkeley Law School details the enactment and enforcement of anti-homeless laws in California. They found that California cities have responded to homelessness with laws that criminalize behavior specific to homeless people: sitting, lying down, resting, begging, and sharing food in public places.

Click here to view the report

More/Leave a Comment

New ICBM Cost Estimates

Posted on 26. Oct, 2016 by .

0

The U.S. plans to replace Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) with new ICBMs. The cost estimates for the new ICBMs have continued to increase and now range from $62 to $100+ billion. Take a look below and click here for a printable version.

New ICBMs cost estimates Final.png

More/Leave a Comment

Iran Nuclear Deal: Correcting Misconceptions

Posted on 26. Oct, 2016 by .

0

Taken from armscontrolcenter.org –

1. Misconception: The Iran Deal included a U.S. payment of $150 billion to Iran

The Facts:

The money that Iran receives from complying with the agreement is not a direct payment from the U.S. government. Instead, the funds are Iranian foreign assets, which the international sanctions regime prevented Iran from accessing. Under the JCPOA, these nuclear-related sanctions were waived after Iran verifiably completed its initial obligations.

The $150 billion figure is also inaccurate. The amount of money Iran could access from these foreign reserves is about $100 billion. Of this amount, about half of it is tied up in Iranian foreign debts and entanglements. As Treasury Secretary, Jacob Lew, testified before Congress, the actual amount that Iran would be able to use is about $50 billion.

2. Misconception: The Iran deal included a ransom payment for hostages

The Facts:

After implementation of the Iran Deal, the United States sent $1.7 billion to Iran. Some are now claiming this was a ransom payment for the return of American citizens that were being held hostage by Iran.

Lisa Grosh, a legal advisor for the Department of State, testified before Congress that the $1.7 billion was comprised of $400 million that Iran had placed in a U.S. Foreign Military Sales trust fund and $1.3 billion in interest. At the time of the Iran deal negotiations, the United States and Iran were involved in a legal arbitration case over the amount of interest the U.S. owed on this fund.

As for the fact that the payment coincided with the hostages’ release, Suzanne Maloney of the Brookings Center explains that “the settlement and the prisoner release were two separate channels.” Once the settlement of the claim was determined, the U.S. simply did not issue payment until the separately-negotiated prisoner release was completed.

3. Misconception: “Breakout time” is the time needed to develop a nuclear bomb

The Facts:

Under the JCPOA, Iran’s “breakout time” is evaluated to be at least one year. But there is an important distinction between the “breakout time” and the amount of time needed to develop a credible nuclear weapon. A country’s “breakout time” is the time required to produce enough weapons-grade uranium or plutonium for one nuclear weapon. The International Atomic Energy Agency estimates this amount to be about 25kg of highly enriched uranium (90% or more of enrichment). However, even if Iran had the required amount and enrichment level of uranium for a nuclear bomb, it would still need time to develop a viable weapon. This includes miniaturizing a nuclear weapon to be attached to a missile and producing a missile that functions accurately and reliably. Both of these developments are challenging and time-consuming. Furthermore, one untested nuclear weapon is not enough for a credible deterrent.

4. Misconception: The Iran Deal stopped Iran’s Nuclear Program

The Facts:

The objective of the JCPOA was to verifiably constrain Iran’s nuclear program and impede progress towards a nuclear weapon. However, the agreement does permit Iran to keep a comparatively small amount of monitored low-enriched uranium. Thus, the Iran Deal does not extinguish all Iranian nuclear activity, but constrains and restricts Iran’s ability to obtain a nuclear weapon. To learn more about Iran’s obligations under the agreement, view the Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation’s factsheet.

More/Leave a Comment

Defend California Children Hurt by Pesticides

Posted on 14. Oct, 2016 by .

0

Over 140 agricultural pesticides of public health concern are used near California schools, daycares and preschools. These aren’t our numbers; this is hard data from the Department of Public Health. Health officials report that Latino children are more likely to attend schools near use of the most hazardous pesticides. Hundreds of thousands of schoolchildren across the state are in harm’s way.

Last week, the California Department of Pesticide Regulation (DPR) finally released a draft plan for protecting schoolchildren from drift-prone, health-harming pesticides. The proposal falls far short of what California kids need and deserve. Tell DPR they can — and must — do much better. The DPR has opened a public comment period.

Click here to sign the petition.

More/Leave a Comment

Engaging in Politics as a Catholic

Posted on 14. Oct, 2016 by .

0

images

Taken from catholicstarherald.com –

The Catholic Church’s most counter-cultural teaching is that politics is a good thing. Yes, despite our extreme polarization and our presidential candidates and the incivility in our current discourse, politics is a good thing and worth a holy effort to save.

Where does the church get such an unpopular idea? In its best form, politics is nothing more — and nothing less — than making decisions about how we want to structure our communities. God has made us social creatures, a truth reflected in the very first pages of Scripture, when Adam and Eve were given to each other so they would not be alone. Figuring out how to live well together is one of the most fundamentally human things we can do.

Pope Francis addressed this theme with his trademark directness and charm during a daily Mass homily in 2013. “Politics, according to the Social Doctrine of the Church, is one of the highest forms of charity, because it serves the common good. I cannot wash my hands, eh? We all have to give something!” he said. “A good Catholic meddles in politics, offering the best of himself, so that those who govern can govern.”

There’s a lot of valuable stuff to unpack in those sentences. Let’s look at three of the Holy Father’s short phrases.

‘[Politics] serves the common good.’

The common good is a central theme of the Catholic Church’s social teaching. Saint John XXIII described it as “all those social conditions which favor the full development of humanity” in his encyclical Mater et Magistra (no. 20). In other words, what do individuals and communities need not only to merely get by, but to flourish?

The Catholic tradition judges our societies not based on how well those at the top are doing, but on how well those at the bottom are cared for. This bottom-up orientation comes straight from Jesus, who tells us that you can see Christ himself in the faces of the hungry, thirsty, stranger, naked, ill, and imprisoned (cf. Mt 25:31-46). Saint Teresa of Calcutta picked up on this theme, calling the desperately poor she served “Christ in his most distressing disguise.” We are called to build our communities with this sort of reverence for those who are marginalized.

A priest friend of mine uses the old “teach a man to fish” proverb to illustrate the role of politics in working for the common good. Sure, it’s better to teach a man to fish than to give him a fish, but what if the water is polluted or there’s a fence built around the lake, keeping the hungry and poor out? What if the common good is compromised because access is limited? Scenarios like that require speaking up for justice to those who have the power to make changes. That’s politics.

imgresPolitics can lead to expanded access to health care and high-quality education, give the poor a hand up on the road out of poverty, safeguard human life from the womb until natural death, fight systemic racism, and transform war into peace. Politics is the best way to assure that the rights of those who are most vulnerable are protected.

While direct assistance to those in need is essential — like feeding the hungry and housing the homeless — politics can move societies toward long-term, community-wide solutions to big injustices. And this is why Pope Francis calls politics “one of the highest forms of charity.”

‘I cannot wash my hands, eh?’

At a faith-sharing gathering I went to a couple of years ago, one of the attendees said she just couldn’t pay attention to the news anymore because the stories were so relentlessly depressing. I could relate. The temptation to disengage from current events is so strong. Politics has the potential to be such a powerful vehicle for good, but we know that it’s often a breeding ground for corruption and injustice.

Pope Francis subtly acknowledges this temptation with his “we cannot wash our hands” line. Yes, there is evil around us, especially in politics. But it is because of this very evil that we are called to get involved. Our job is not to condemn politics, but to help redeem it. This is part of the human mission laid out in Genesis 2, when God places Adam and Eve in Eden to “cultivate and care for it” (2:15), a responsibility passed down to us descendants. We don’t get to bail. God requires our cooperation to take care of the planet and his children living here.

In the United States, one common reason Christians give for avoiding politics is fear of violating “the separation of church and state” — a phrase that doesn’t even appear in the United States Constitution, by the way. While our country’s founders didn’t want the government to sponsor or impinge on any particular religious tradition, the U.S. bishops argue that people of faith have the “moral obligation” to use their free speech rights to bring their values and voices to the public square (Forming Consciences for Faithful Citizenship, no. 13).

When I think of faith-based political action, I remember a few powerful meetings I have attended with elected officials, sitting alongside undocumented, Catholic immigrants who were there to speak up in favor of comprehensive immigration reform. They said things like, “Because of my faith, I believe that every person is a child of God and equal in his eyes. I think it’s wrong that my family has to live in fear that I’ll be deported. Our immigration laws have to change.”

A good Catholic meddles in politics.

So if politics is a high form of charity and cannot be ignored by people of faith, what’s a good Catholic’s meddling supposed to look like?

I bet the first thing that comes to mind for a lot of us is voting, especially during this election season. We are blessed in this country with the ability to help shape our own destiny by electing political leaders — a human right that the Catholic Church argues should be accessible in all nations. The U.S. bishops have a document called Forming Consciences for Faithful Citizenship that’s meant to help Catholics prepare to vote. This is an essential element of political involvement. But there’s so much more.

Georgetown’s John Carr also likes to say that if politicians go wherever the wind blows, it’s our job to change the wind. There are 1,532 days between the 2016 presidential election and the one in 2020. That’s a lot of time to raise our voices in legislative advocacy, speaking up with and for those who are often pushed to society’s margins. Our elected leaders should be hearing from Catholics all the time about issues that affect the common good, via phone calls, emails, handwritten letters, and in-person meetings. They should not be able to tell which party we belong to, as our church’s consistent defense of the most vulnerable means we agree with Republicans on some things and Democrats on others — and often not matching up perfectly even when we do agree.

Our national bishops’ conference, state-based Catholic conferences, and nonprofits like Catholic Charities and Catholic Relief Services monitor legislation and send out action alerts when key votes are coming up at various levels of government. As Nov. 8 approaches, absolutely do spend some time reflecting on how you will vote and why. But on Nov. 9, consider asking yourself how you might practice politics in the days between elections.

Whatever Catholic meddling in politics looks like, it should always be rooted in prayer. Pope Francis said all these things about politics while preaching on Saint Paul’s First Letter to Timothy, Chapter 2: “First of all, then, I ask that supplications, prayers, petitions, and thanksgivings be offered for everyone, for kings and for all in authority, that we may lead a quiet and tranquil life in all devotion and dignity.” In other words, pray for your political leaders. They images-1need it. Also, pray for guidance for the rest of us, as it will only be through reliance on God’s grace that we’ll be able to build a politics that reflects divine peace, justice and love.

More/Leave a Comment